|
Artículo
del mes
Bovine Spongiform
Encephalopathy and Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease: Background,
Evolution, and Current Concerns
Paul Brown,* Robert G. Will,† Raymond Bradley,‡ David M. Asher,§
and &Linda Detwiler
*National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; †National Creutzfeldt-Jakob
Disease Surveillance Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh,
Scotland; ‡Central Veterinary Laboratory, New Haw, Addlestone, UK;
§Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration,
Rockville, Maryland, USA; &Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Robbinsville, New Jersey,
USA
| The epidemic of bovine
spongiform encephalopathy in the United Kingdom, which began
in 1986 and has affected nearly 200,000 cattle, is waning
to a conclusion, but leaves in its wake an outbreak of human
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, most probably resulting from
the consumption of beef products contaminated by central
nervous system tissue. Although averaging only 10-15 cases
a year since its first appearance in 1994, its future magnitude
and geographic distribution (in countries that have imported
infected British cattle or cattle products, or have endogenous
BSE) cannot yet be predicted. The possibility that large
numbers of apparently healthy persons might be incubating
the disease raises concerns about iatrogenic transmissions
through instrumentation (surgery and medical diagnostic
procedures) and blood and organ donations. Government agencies
in many countries continue to implement new measures to
minimize this risk. |
Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
"The hungry Sheep look up, and are not fed,
But swoln with wind, and the rank mist they draw
Rot inwardly, and foul contagion spread…"
John Milton, Lycidas (1637)
Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) or "mad cow disease" appears
to have originated from scrapie, an endemic spongiform encephalopathy
of sheep and goats that has been recognized in Europe since the
mid-18th century (1).
It has since spread to most sheep-breeding countries and is widespread
in the United Kingdom (UK), where until 1988 the rendered carcasses
of livestock (including sheep) were fed to ruminants and other animals
as a protein-rich nutritional supplement.
During rendering, carcasses from which all consumable parts had
been removed were milled and then decomposed in large vats by boiling
at atmospheric or higher pressures, producing an aqueous slurry
of protein under a layer of fat (tallow). After the fat was removed,
the slurry was dessicated into a meat and bone meal product that
was packaged by the animal food industry and distributed to owners
of livestock and other captive animals (e.g., zoo and laboratory
animals, breeding species, pets).
Although elements of the ensuing story are still disputed (including
its origin from scrapie, rather than from unrecognized endemic BSE),
it appears likely that changes in the rendering process that had
taken place around 1980 allowed the etiologic agent in infected
carcasses to survive, contaminate the protein supplement, and infect
cattle. Cattle carcasses and carcass wastes were then recycled through
the rendering plants, increasing the levels of the now cattle-adapted
pathogen in the protein supplement and eventually causing a full-scale
BSE epidemic (2-5).
|
Figure |
|
|
 |
|
|
Click to view enlarged image
Figure. Time course of epidemic
bovine spongiform encephalopathy in the United Kingdom, 1986-2000,
with dates of major precautionary interventions....
|
|
Recognition of this source of infection has led to a series of
countermeasures taken by the UK and other countries to break the
cycle of cattle reinfection, restrict the geographic spread of disease,
and eliminate potential sources of new infections
(Figure,Appendix). Probably the single most important measure
in the UK was the imposition in 1988 of a ruminant protein feed
ban that by 1992 began to bring the epidemic under control. However,
the loss of nearly 200,000 diseased cattle, followed by pre-emptive
slaughter and destruction of nearly four and a half million asymptomatic
cattle >30 months of age, has crippled the British livestock
industry and also affected the tallow, gelatin, and pharmaceutical
industries, all of which make bovine-derived products.
BSE is not restricted to the UK. Cases have occurred in many other
countries as a result of imported live animals or livestock food
supplements (Table 1). In some countries, including the UK, the
incidence of new cases is decreasing, but in other countries:France,
Portugal, Germany, Spain, and the Republic of Ireland: the incidence
appears to be increasing, or initial cases have only recently appeared.
The explanation for this phenomenon is most probably improved case
ascertainment (supported by active surveillance and immunologic
methods), but new infections from contaminated feed intended for
other species (e.g., pigs and poultry) may also be a contributing
factor. Although in many countries, BSE has been identified in native-born
cattle, no indigenous index case has been reported outside the UK
(i.e., no case originating de novo or from cow-to-cow transmission).
Whatever the origin of these cases, recycling of their contaminated
tissues through livestock feed supplements could have occurred in
the same way as in the UK.
| Table
1. Reported cases of bovine spongiform encephalopathy
in the United Kingdom and other countries (as of December 2000)a |
|
| Country |
Native cases
|
Imported cases
|
Total cases
|
|
| United Kingdom |
180,376b
|
0
|
180,376
|
| Republic of
Ireland |
487
|
12
|
499
|
| Portugal |
446
|
6
|
452
|
| Switzerlandc |
363
|
0
|
363
|
| Francec |
150
|
1
|
151
|
| Belgium |
18
|
0
|
18
|
| Netherlands |
6
|
0
|
6
|
| Liechtenstein |
2
|
0
|
2
|
| Denmark |
1
|
1
|
2
|
| Luxembourg |
1
|
0
|
1
|
| Germany |
3
|
6
|
9
|
| Oman |
0
|
2
|
2
|
| Italy |
0
|
2
|
2
|
| Spaind |
0
|
2
|
2
|
| Canada |
0
|
1
|
1
|
| Falklands (UK) |
0
|
1
|
1
|
| Azores (Portugal)e |
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
aData
from Organization of International Epizootics(Paris) and Ministry
of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food (UK).
bIncludes 1,287 cases in offshore British islands.
cIncludes cases detected by active surveillance with immunologic
methods.
dOrigin and dates of imported cases are under investigation.
eCase imported from Germany.
BSE has not occurred in the United States or other countries
that have historically imported little or no live cattle,
beef products, or livestock nutritional supplements from the
UK. Even though rendering procedures in other countries underwent
changes similar to those in the UK during the late 1970s,
BSE has apparently emerged solely within the UK. The most
plausible explanation is that the proportion of sheep in the
mix of rendered animal carcasses and the proportion of scrapie
infections in such sheep were probably higher in the UK than
elsewhere. These proportions were apparently sufficient to
bring very low levels of the etiologic agent in batches of
rendered carcasses over the threshold of transmission in the
UK but not in other countries (5). An alternative explanation
proposed in the recent Report of the BSE Inquiry (6) is that
a pathogenic mutation occurred in cattle in the 1970s.
Either of these two hypotheses satisfies the need for an
etiologic "seed" to survive the altered rendering process
and escalate through recycling of an ever-larger number of
infected carcasses. However, the bovine origin hypothesis
assumes that a mutation occurred only in the UK and not in
other countries where similar rendering processes would also
have led to epidemic BSE if mutations were occurring. In humans,
mutations have occurred all over the world, not just in the
UK, and there is no reason to suppose that humans differ in
this respect from other mammalian species. It would therefore
be peculiar if the UK had the misfortune to host the cattle
world’s only mutation.
Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD)
How soon hath Time, the subtle thief of youth,
Stol’n on his wing my three and twentieth year!
John Milton, Sonnet (1632)
Within weeks of identification of the first case of BSE,
concern was expressed about human risk (7-13), and as the
epidemic unfolded, a series of measures was taken to eradicate
BSE and prevent potentially infected tissues from reaching
the human food chain (Appendix). A surveillance unit to monitor
CJD was established in the UK in May 1990, and 3 years later,
surveillance was extended to several other European countries,
coordinated through the European Union. By this means it was
hoped that any change in the epidemiology of CJD in the UK
could be detected quickly and that the significance of the
change could be assessed by comparison with the epidemiology
of CJD in continental Europe.
Concern was heightened by the discovery that some exotic
zoo ungulates, as well as domestic and captive wild cats,
were becoming infected (14-18). The ungulates and domestic
cats had also been fed diets supplemented by meat and bone
meal, and the wild cats had been fed uncooked tissues, including
cattle heads and spines. The possibility could therefore not
be ignored that the disease might also cross the species barrier
to humans from the consumption of beef or dairy products,
or perhaps from occupational contact with cattle by ranchers,
dairymen, or slaughterhouse workers.
What muted concerns about human infection was the presumption
that BSE originated from scrapie, and scrapie was not a human
pathogen. Nevertheless, even those who considered human risk
to be remote acknowledged that scrapie might unpredictably
show an altered host range after passage through cattle. Experimental
precedents for such behavior were well known: passage of mouse-adapted
strains of scrapie through hamsters altered their transmissibility
on back passage to rodents (19,20); human strains of kuru
or CJD did not transmit to ferrets or goats until passaged
through primates or cats (21); and a bovine strain of BSE
did not transmit to hamsters until passaged through mice (22).
Alternatively, if BSE originated from a spontaneous mutation
in cattle, experimental studies of species susceptibility
to this new strain of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy
(TSE) had not sufficiently advanced to predict that humans
would not be susceptible. Nevertheless, during the 10 years
after the first case of BSE was identified, cases of CJD did
not increase in groups at high risk and continued to occur
in the general population with the same spectrum of clinical
and neuropathologic features as before the appearance of BSE.
Then, from May to October 1995, the CJD Surveillance Unit
was notified of three cases of CJD in patients 16, 19, and
29 years of age (23,24). On neuropathologic examination, all
three patients had amyloid plaques, which was unexpected in
view of their occurrence in only 5%-10% of sporadic cases
of CJD. The comparative youth of the patients and this unusual
neuropathologic finding prompted a search for similar features
in patients whose deaths might have been attributed to other
diagnoses. In particular, cases of subacute sclerosing panencephalitis
(SSPE) were scrutinized in view of a report from Poland that
cases of CJD in three young patients had been identified by
SSPE surveillance (25). No such cases were found in a review
of the UK SSPE register.
If CJD in young patients was not being obscured by misdiagnosis,
perhaps it reflected increased physician awareness through
publicity surrounding BSE and iatrogenic CJD in recipients
of contaminated growth hormone, or the active CJD surveillance
program instituted in the UK, or the availability of genetic
and proteinase-resistant protein (PrP) immunocytochemistry.
Although all these factors may have contributed to ascertainment
bias, most of the excess cases were in older age groups, in
which CJD was now being diagnosed more often than in earlier
decades.
By December 1995, the Surveillance Unit had been informed
of 10 suspected cases of CJD in persons <50 years of age.
Some were found to have sporadic or familial CJD or some other
disease; however, two of the patients, ages 29 and 30 years,
were later confirmed neuropathologically to have CJD and,
like the previous three CJD patients, had extensive plaque
deposition. As of January 1, 1996, the relationship between
these cases and BSE began to excite suspicion but remained
tentative because critical information judged necessary to
establish a probable connection was still missing (Table 2).
|
Table
2. Evolving assessment of criteria used to link
bovine spongiform encephalopathy and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob
disease
|
|
|
Assessment through early
1996
|
|
|
|
Criteria
|
Jan 1
|
Feb 1
|
Mar 1
|
Mar 8
|
Mar 20
|
|
|
Novel clinical phenotype
|
Uncertain
|
Possible
|
Probable
|
Probable
|
Probable
|
|
Novel neuropathologic phenotype
|
Uncertain
|
Possible
|
Probable
|
Probable
|
Probable
|
|
Distinct from pre-1980 cases
in UK
|
Unknown
|
Possible
|
Probable
|
Probable
|
Probable
|
|
No association with PRNP mutations
|
Uncertain
|
Uncertain
|
Uncertain
|
Probable
|
Probable
|
|
Distinct from cases outside
UK
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Possible
|
Probable
|
|
During January, two additional cases of CJD
in young patients were neuropathologically confirmed, and
a distinctive clinical syndrome associated with plaque formation
was beginning to emerge: young age at onset, early psychiatric
symptoms, prominent ataxia, absence of periodic electroencephalographic
activity, and a comparatively prolonged illness. However,
each of these features, alone or in combination, may also
be seen in classic sporadic or familial CJD. Caution was further
justified by a review of the records of pre-1980 CJD patients
in the UK, which identified three young patients who shared
some of these features, and by the results of an inquiry about
young patients with CJD in other European countries, which
showed an age distribution similar to that in the UK. A major
concern was that these seven apparently similar cases might
represent a heterogeneous group of patients with sporadic
and familial forms of CJD. Full comparative neuropathologic
examination of both pre- and post-1980 cases of CJD in young
persons was needed, along with PRNP gene sequence analysis
of as many cases as possible.
During February 1996, an additional case was referred to
the Surveillance Unit with a clinical evolution similar to
that of the previous seven patients, and neuropathologic examination
of recent and historical cases confirmed that the recent cases
were indeed distinctive. In particular, a morphologically
unusual form of plaque was present in all cases: the florid
or "daisy" plaque in which an amyloid core was surrounded
by "petals" of spongiform change. As of March 1, despite the
likelihood that this group of patients had a "new variant"
of CJD, it was still unclear whether mutations were involved
and whether such a syndrome was also occurring outside the
UK–both points essential to confirming the association of
this variant disease with exposure to BSE.
On March 4, genetic analysis was completed for six of the
cases, and no pathogenic mutation was identified. These results
effectively ruled out a genetic cause for the syndrome (although
they did not rule out a genetic predisposition) and left the
only remaining uncertainty–the geographic distribution of
the variant phenotype–to be resolved by the European CJD surveillance
system. The answer came by March 20: none of the young CJD
patients in other European countries had the clinical and
neuropathologic features of the UK cases. In the preceding
week, two more variant cases had been neuropathologically
confirmed, and a report on the entire group of 10 cases concluded
that an unrecognized variant of CJD occurring only in persons
<45 years of age was probably due to exposure to BSE (26).
This link has now been convincingly established in laboratory
studies showing identical, distinctive biological and molecular
biological features of the pathologic agent isolated from
BSE-infected cattle and human cases of vCJD (27-29). The source
of contamination appears to have been beef. However, muscle
has never been reproducibly shown to contain the infectious
agent in any form of spongiform encephalopathy, whatever the
affected species, and thus, infection most probably resulted
from beef products contaminated by nervous system tissue.
Contamination could have occurred in any of the following
ways: cerebral vascular emboli from cranial stunning instruments
used to immobilize cattle before killing by exsanguination;
contact of muscle with brain or spinal cord tissue by saws
or other tools used during slaughter; inclusion of paraspinal
ganglia in cuts of meat containing vertebral tissue (e.g.,
T-bone steaks); and perhaps most importantly, the presence
of residual spinal cord and paraspinal ganglia tissue in the
paste of "mechanically recovered meat" (a carcass compression
extract) that could legally be added to cooked meat products
such as meat pies, beef sausages, and various canned meat
preparations. Measures have since been taken to eliminate
these sources of potential contamination and limit the consequences
of any contamination that may already have occurred (Appendix).
Although the amount of infectious tissue ingested must be
a critical determinant for the transmission of BSE to humans
in the form of vCJD, the human genotype at polymorphic codon
129 of the PRNP gene appears to play an important role in
susceptibility to infection. The encoding alternatives, methionine
(Met) and valine (Val), are distributed in the general Caucasian
population in the approximate proportions of 50% Met/Val,
40% Met/Met, and 10% Val/Val. All 76 vCJD patients tested
have been homozygous for methionine, and the apparently single
infecting strain of BSE may not be able to replicate in any
other human genotype. However, it is also possible that (as
in the analogous oral infection of kuru and in peripheral
iatrogenic CJD infections) heterozygotes are comparatively
resistant to disease and become ill after longer incubation
periods than those of homozygotes (30-33).
Predictions about the vCJD Outbreak
Think not but that I know these things; or
think
I know them not: not therefore am I short
Of knowing what I ought.
John Milton, Paradise Regained (1671)
The onset of illness in the first case of vCJD
occurred in early 1994, nearly a decade after the first case
of BSE was recognized in cattle. Assuming that the earliest
appearance of vCJD reflects the earliest exposure to BSE,
this incubation period is consistent with those following
peripheral infections in experimental animals and in cases
of iatrogenic CJD in humans. Through the end of November 2000,
the overall tally was 87 definite or probable cases of vCJD
in the UK, 2 confirmed and 1 probable case in France, and
a single confirmed case in the Republic of Ireland (Table
3). The Irish patient had lived for some years in England;
however, none of the French patients had lived in or visited
the UK, so their infection must have come either from beef
or beef products imported from the UK (approximately 5%-10%
of the beef consumed in France) or from BSE-affected cattle
in France. From a European standpoint, it would be much more
troubling if imported beef were the source, as most European
countries also imported beef or beef products from the UK,
although in smaller quantities.
|
Table
3. Chronology of variant Creutzfeld-Jakob
disease (vCJD) in the United Kingdom and other European
countries, as of December 2000
|
|
|
|
Year of onset
|
United Kingdom
|
France
|
Ireland
|
|
|
1994
|
8
|
1
|
|
|
1995
|
10
|
|
|
|
1996
|
11
|
|
|
|
1997
|
14
|
|
|
|
1998
|
17
|
|
|
|
1999a
|
20 (+4)
|
1 (+1)
|
1
|
|
2000a
|
1 (+2)
|
|
|
|
|
aParentheses indicate
still-living persons with probable vCJD or deceased
persons whose diagnoses have not yet been confirmed
by neuropathologic examination. In 2000, additional
cases have been identified that do not yet meet the
minimum clinical criteria for a premortem diagnosis
of "probable" vCJD. Dates are for year of onset of
illness, not year of death.
Unlike the BSE epidemic, the vCJD outbreak has
shown only a modest increase during its first 6 years,
and the number of cases with onsets in 2000
remains well below the previous year’s total, although
additional cases will certainly be identified in coming
months. The difference between BSE and vCJD may be
due to the fact that in humans, recycling of infected
tissue has not occurred, and thus the epidemic will
evolve much more slowly than in cattle, or the difference
may indicate a limited outbreak in humans due to very
small infectious doses that, except in genetically
susceptible persons, cannot surmount the combined
effects of a species barrier and comparatively inefficient
route of infection.
Much of the lingering uncertainty about the extent
of the vCJD outbreak is attributable to the fact that
the incubation period of vCJD is unknown. If the average
incubation period is 10 to 15 years, the earliest
patients with vCJD would have been infected in the
early 1980s, when BSE was still silently incubating
in small but increasing numbers of cattle. In this
case, the large increase in human exposure to contaminated
tissues during the late 1980s could lead to a parallel
increase in cases of vCJD during the next few years.
If, however, the average incubation period of vCJD
is 5 to 10 years, the earliest human infections would
have begun in the mid- to late 1980s, when exposure
to BSE was maximal. In this case, the outbreak of
vCJD should remain small because of measures to eliminate
both animal and human exposure to BSE instituted from
1987 to 1997. Depending on assumptions about the incubation
period and other variables, mathematical modeling
predicts that the total extent of the outbreak could
range from fewer than one hundred to hundreds of thousands
of cases (34-37).
If large numbers of infected persons are silently
incubating the disease, the potential for human-to-human
iatrogenic spread of vCJD is very real. Such apparently
healthy persons would be subject to the same kinds
of medical and surgical procedures experienced by
the general population, including endoscopies, vascular
catheterizations, operations for trauma or illness,
and blood and organ donations. If, as suspected, the
amount and distribution of the infectious agent in
tissues of persons with vCJD is greater than in other
forms of CJD, the exposure of medical and surgical
instruments to possibly infectious internal tissues
and the transfer of tissues as grafts and transplants
become a matter of much greater concern than the nearly
negligible risk currently posed by cases of sporadic
CJD.
Recent and Future Policy Decisions
A little onward lend thy guiding hand
To these dark steps, a little further on…
John Milton, Samson Agonistes (1671)
Several governments have implemented
policies to minimize the risk for human-to-human disease
transmission through blood donations from apparently
healthy persons who may be in the incubation phase
of vCJD. In the UK, where whole blood or blood products
from some persons who later died of vCJD have been
administered to others, all plasma is imported and
all blood from UK donors is filtered to eliminate
leukocytes, which are the most likely carriers of
infectivity in blood (38-40). In the United States,
a blood donor policy excludes donations from anyone
who has lived in or visited the UK for a cumulative
period of 6 months or more during 1980 to 1996. The
6-month period was based on the fact that >80%
of total US person-years in the UK would be excluded
and that the 2%-3% deficit of blood donors resulting
from the deferral could be absorbed by the blood banking
industry without undue shortages. Several countries
(Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, Japan,
and Germany) have since applied these criteria and
formulated similar policies.
Because of the possibility of widespread
infection in the UK, concern extends beyond blood
and organ donors to the safe use of medical and surgical
instruments, particularly those used in neurosurgery
and ophthalmic surgery. In the absence of a screening
test, a zero-risk policy is untenable because it would
require termination of the national organ donor program.
A compromise might be the temporary deferral of organ
donors–or perhaps only corneal donors–younger than
30 or 40 years of age. However, this measure might
so diminish (and panic) the donor population as to
be inadvisable. Similar considerations apply to invasive
medical and surgical procedures: sound medical practice
cannot be suspended on a basis of the theoretical
risk for vCJD, and it would be unethical to deny needed
procedures to persons suspected of having CJD. Under
the circumstances, disposable instruments should be
used whenever possible, and a standard sterilization
protocol for reusable instruments should be implemented
that includes the most stringent possible disinfectants
(e.g., the combined use of 1 N sodium hydroxide and
autoclaving at 134°C, as recommended in the recent
World Health Organization guidelines on infection
control for CJD [41]). No effective sterilization
procedure yet exists for instruments or instrument
parts too delicate to withstand these harsh measures.
Each such instrument must be disinfected to the maximum
extent possible, for example by washing repeatedly
with detergent/proteinase solutions and exposing the
washed instruments to less harsh chemicals (e.g.,
6 M urea or 4 M guanidinium thiocyanate) that have
shown moderate to good disinfection of TSE tissue
extracts (42-44).
An equally important issue is whether
the bovine-adapted scrapie agent has recrossed the
species barrier to sheep, carrying its newly acquired
ability to infect humans. The only reliable method
to distinguish strains of TSE is a time-consuming
comparison of incubation periods and topographic features
of brain lesions after injection into different strains
of inbred mice (28). Glycotyping of PrP strains extracted
from diseased brain tissue is much faster but has
not been convincingly shown to discriminate reliably
between BSE and scrapie. Moreover, neither method
has been used to test a sheep-adapted strain of BSE
(that is, after multiple passages through sheep),
which might have lost the distinguishing characteristics
found on primary passage from cow to sheep.
If BSE did back-cross to sheep fed the
same contaminated meat and bone meal that infected
cattle, the consequences for humans will remain limited
to the same period of risk as BSE–roughly 1980 through
1996–unless sheep BSE, like sheep scrapie, can be
horizontally or maternally transmitted. Without a
test to discriminate between the two diseases, there
would be no defense against the development of endemic
BSE in sheep and the consequent risk for human infection
from sheep as well as cows. Therefore, global elimination
of animal TSEs must seriously be considered.
Such a goal is more practical than it
was even a few years ago. National programs to eliminate
scrapie have historically relied on selective slaughter
of blood lines or in some cases entire flocks in which
scrapie was identified, and all such attempts have
failed. Molecular genetic tools are now available
to guide scrapie-resistance breeding programs that
until recently depended on field observation and classical
genetics, and immunologic tools can detect preclinical
scrapie infection in tonsils, third eyelids, and possibly
blood (45-48). The environmental durability of TSE
pathogens will make their eradication difficult (49,50);
however, the global elimination of TSE in sheep and
other animals is a goal worth the expense, effort,
and patience that will be needed for its achievement.
Dr. Paul Brown is Senior Research Scientist
in the Laboratory of Central Nervous System Studies
at the National Institutes of Health. His most recent
research focuses on the problem of iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob
disease and on the potential for disease transmission
through the administration of blood or blood products.
He serves as consultant to the European CJD surveillance
program and as Chairman of TSEAC, the transmissible
spongiform encephalopathy advisory committee of the
United States Food and Drug Administration.
Address for correspondence: Paul Brown, Building
36, Room 4A-05, National Institutes of Health, 36
Convent Drive, MSC 4122 Bethesda, MD 20892-4122; fax:
301-496-8275; e-mail: brownp@ninds.nih.gov
References
-
The BSE inquiry:
report, evidence and supporting papers of the
inquiry into the emergence and identification
of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) and
variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD) and the
action taken in response to it up to 20 March
1996. Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Chairman.
London: The Stationery Office. October 26, 2000.
-
-
-
-
Dealer SF, Lacey RW. Transmissible
spongiform encephalopathies: the threat of BSE
to man. Food Microbiol 1990;7:253-79.
-
-
Will RG. Is there a potential
risk of transmission of BSE to the human population
and how may this be assessed? In: Bradley R, Savey
M, Marchant B, editors. Sub-acute spongiform encephalopathies.
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991. p.
179-86.
-
Brown P. The clinical epidemiology
of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the context of
bovine spongiform encephalopathy. In: Bradley
R, Savey M, Marchant B, editors. Sub-acute spongiform
encephalopathies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers;
1991. p. 195-202.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Gibbs CJ Jr, Gajdusek
DC, Amyx H. Strain variation in the viruses of
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and kuru. In: Prusiner
SB, Hadlow WJ, editors. Slow transmissible diseases
of the nervous system. Volume 2. New York: Academic
Press; 1979. p. 87-110.
-
-
-
-
Kulczycki J, Jedrzejowska H, Gajkowski
K, Tarnowska-Dziduszko E, Lojkowska W. Creutzfeldt-Jakob
disease in young people. Eur J Epidemiol 1991;5:501-4.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Lee H-S, Brown
P, Cervenáková L, Garruto RM, Alpers MP, Gajdusek
DC, et al. Evidence for susceptibility of the
129MM PRNP genotype in epidemic kuru. J Infect
Dis. In press 2000.
-
-
-
-
-
Donnelly CA, Ferguson
NM. Predictions and scenario analysis for vCJD.
In: Statistical aspects of BSE and vCJD: models
for an epidemic. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press LLC;
1999. p.163-94.
-
-
Brown P. Can Creutzfeldt-Jakob
disease be transmitted by transfusion? Curr Opin
Hematol 1995;76:472-7.
-
-
Brown P, Cervenáková L. Reply
to a letter to the editor. Transfusion 2000;40:754-5.
-
WHO infection control
guidelines for transmissible spongiform encephalopathies:
report of a WHO Consultation. WHO/CDS/CSR/APH/2000.3.
Geneva: March 23-26, 1999.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Schmerr MJ, Jenny AL, Bulgin MS,
Miller JM, Hamir AN, Cutlip RC, et al. Use of
capillary electrophoresis and fluorescent labeled
peptides to detect the abnormal prion protein
in the blood of animals that are infected with
a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy. J Chromatog
A 1999;853:207-14.
-
Brown P, Cervenáková L, Diringer
H. Blood infectivity and the prospects for a diagnostic
screening test in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. J
Lab Clin Med. In press 2001.
-
Palsson PA. Rida (scrapie) in
Iceland and its epidemiology. In: Prusiner SB,
Hadlow WJ, editors. Slow transmissible diseases
of the nervous system. Vol. 1. New York: Academic
Press; 1979. p. 357-66.
-
Appendix
| Table
A. Measures taken to prevent the spread
of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) to
animals |
|
|
|
European
|
|
| Precautions |
Great Britaina
|
Uniona
|
United States |
|
| BSE made a notifiable
disease |
Jun 1988
|
Apr 1990
|
Nov 1987
|
| BSE surveillance, with
histologic examination of brains |
Jun 1988
|
May 1990
|
May 1990
|
| Ban on ruminant protein
in ruminant feed |
Jul 1988
|
|
|
| Ban on export of UK
cattle born before July 1988 feed ban |
|
Jul 1989
|
|
| Ban on import of live
ruminants and most ruminant products from all
BSE countries |
|
|
Jul/Nov 1989
|
| Ban on export of UK
cattle >6 months of age |
|
Mar 1990
|
|
| Ban on SBOb
for use in animal nutrition; ban on export of
SBO and feed containing SBO to EUc
countries |
Sep 1990
|
|
|
| High-risk waste to
be rendered at 133°C/3 bar/20 min (or other
approved procedure) |
|
Nov 1990
|
|
| Ban on export of SBO
and feed containing SBO to non-EU countries |
Jul 1991
|
|
|
| Ban on MBMd
from SBO in fertilizer |
Nov 1991
|
|
|
| After Jan 1, 1995,
rendering methods must sterilize BSE |
|
Jun 1994
|
|
| Ban on mammalian MBM
in ruminant feed |
|
Jul 1994
|
|
| BSE surveillance includes
immunohistologic features of brains |
|
|
Oct 1993
|
| Ban on mammalian protein
in ruminant feede |
Nov 1994
|
|
Aug 1997
|
| Ban on import of live
ruminants and most ruminant products (including
meat products) from all countries of Europe |
|
|
Dec 1997
|
| Immunologic testing
for ruminant protein in animal feed |
|
Jul 1995
|
|
| Mammalian MBM prohibited
from all animal feed/fertilizer |
Mar/Apr 1996
|
|
|
| Slaughtered cattle
>30 months old (except certain beef cattle
>42 months old) ruled unfit for animal use
(hides for leather excluded) |
Mar 1996
|
|
|
| Mammalian MBM and MBM-containing
feed recalled |
Jun 1996
|
|
|
| All mammalian waste
to be rendered at 133°C/3
bar/20 min (or other approved procedure) |
|
Jul 1996
|
|
| Cattle tracing system
improved |
Sep 1998
|
|
|
| Quarantine of 3 sheep
flocks imported from Europe with possible exposure
to BSE (4 animals die with atypical TSEf) |
|
|
Oct 1998
|
| BSE surveillance of
fallen stock (downer cows) is intensified |
|
|
Oct 1998
|
| Proposal to eradicate
scrapie is rejuvenated |
|
|
Nov 1999
|
| Allow export of deboned
beef from cattle >30 months old born
after July 1996 |
| | | |